01

Evidence and opinion are distinguished in the writing

Articles are organised by topic, not by a separate content-type system. Within each piece, evidence and personal interpretation are kept distinct in the prose itself: sourced findings are attributed clearly, and evidence-informed judgement may appear in the body where it helps interpret the evidence, with the author’s perspective usually developed most fully in the closing — always in the same editorial voice, without a separate opinion box or label — so the article still reads as one authored piece.

02

Claims should be traceable to sources

Articles include a references section when verified sources are available. Unverified or unfinished citations are not presented as confirmed evidence.

03

Uncertainty is stated, not smoothed over

Where evidence is mixed, observational, or still developing, the writing says so, rather than presenting a settled-sounding conclusion for the sake of a cleaner narrative.

04

This is not medical advice

Nothing on this site is intended to diagnose, treat, or replace consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. Articles include a disclaimer to this effect.

05

Corrections are welcome

If you spot an error, an outdated figure, or a claim that needs better sourcing, please get in touch. Corrections will be made transparently.

06

Editorial independence

Health in Blog is an independent personal editorial project by Constantinos Nearchou. It is not an institutional publication and does not speak for any employer, university, or organisation unless explicitly stated in a specific article.

Questions about this policy?

Reach out directly, or read more about the author and the purpose of this publication.